"Just sharing about: Health and things that are important to know !"
June 28th, 2013 at 3:39 pm
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Healthy Lifestyle

Hello readers of my blog! I want to welcome the new people who have subscribed in to stay informed!
This campaign is very important! They want to make a movie about the thruth what is happening with vaccines, food and other important issues. The last year I was busy investigating a lot of health issues and I encountered a lot of these issues they want to make a movie about. So that is why I got interested to place this on my blog! Because I was also very upset to find out the truth about these issues. I am sure a lot of people don’t know about the harm governments and pharmaceutic companies do against humanity. For me it is very important that these issues are exposed to all people of the world!  So please help them to make that film and you get one yourself or maybe you like even more! Within 65 hours they hope to reach the goal!
Just some text taken from their website! They won’t get the big sponsors because of they want to show the real story!
“There is something horribly wrong with health care today. While we were filming Doctored, we kept running into the signs of it. Huge money, billions and billions of dollars flowing into the same pockets. Meanwhile, MD’s aren’t being allowed to actually practice the art of medicine, Chiropractors are marginalized and sidelined and anyone who questions vaccination safety, pharmaceuticals, factory farms, etc. is ridiculed and belittled.

Meanwhile, the billions keep flowing, carried on a river of pain and anguish. Huge corporations funded by individual misery, one broken life at a time.

Someone has to tell this story. Someone has to do it right, give it a chance to really be heard. Someone? That’s us, you and me.

If not us, who? If not now, when?”

So buy a DVD so they have the money to go on making the movie!

Technorati Tags: food, health, healthcare, Movie, vaccines

November 20th, 2011 at 11:22 pm
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Cancer,Cancer Treatments

The next cure to cancer?

If you read the article I saw today placed on a blog Can-do-ability you would think, Yes!!!

But when you read the total text you see that the FDA is working against it. I just want to show this, because I see a lot of people around me not believing that this is happening and that they still believe in the treatments they give to treat cancer. These given treatments let people suffer and the chance to heal totally is very small. After surviving the cancer than there is still the question if people have the possibility to become pregnant and get healthy children or even if they get a normal life back. I know people who survived cancer but they never came back to the life they had before. Less energy, more often ill and yes they are happy to be alive, but sad that they don’t have back their lifes the way they used to. You would think that the FDA would be pleased to give permission for those cures with less problems for the cured people. But they don’t!

The following text got my attention in the blog Can-do-ability

“Dr Burzynski discovered a missing strain of peptides in blood and urine within cancer patients. The word peptide is a biochemical term, but a peptide is basically a molecule consisting of two or more amino acids. He thought that if he could chemically extract peptides from healthy people’s blood and urine and administer them into those with cancer, it could essentially cure them. This is known as Antineoplaston treatment.”

This is a very common way to cure a lot of diseases and also a lot cheaper. This way of treatment don’t need chemotherapy and is much more natural as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Chemotherapy gives a lot of side effects and a lot of people suffer a lot from this kind of treatments. Radiation is not healthy either, because the more radiation the more the healthy cells suffer as well. Surgery is cutting away the cancer, but also an easy way to spread the cancer in the body!

“Dr Burzynski doesn’t claim to be a miracle worker or a saint, but he does promise to treat all his patients with his non invasive treatment and hope for the best. He currently has a 50 – 60% success rate with his breakthrough treatment, which is a lot higher than the success rate for those receiving other common treatments. So why aren’t more terminally ill patients offered this alternative treatment? According to Burzynski’s supporters, if this does become a common practice, it will take down the whole cancer treatment industry, which will lose billions and billions of dollars in decades of research, funding and technology.”

If the body receive chemotherapy and radiation, it becomes much more difficult for the body to heal itself!  This because of the damage these treatments cause to the cells in the whole body! Also, if people get morfine as a painkiller, this has also a negative effect on the healing process! Even if people start getting a natural treatment after chemotherapy or radiation, it will be less effective, because of the damage caused by previous treatment. Though there is still a much bigger chance of healing than promised by chemo and radiation.

Please do yourself a favour and read the article on Can-do-ability

and for the people just reading my blog for the first time see my articles about the FDA!




Technorati Tags: Cancer, cancer treatment, chemotherapy, cure for cancer, Dr Burzynski, FDA, Natural cure, natural treatment, treatment

July 26th, 2011 at 9:12 pm
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Vitamins and Minerals

and some others I will update these later with more!

Technorati Tags: ilovehits, prosperityhits4u, Traffic Exchanges, trafficera, trafficwitch. My Health Science

July 8th, 2011 at 12:29 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Vitamins and Minerals

The question: Is it possible to cure diseases on a natural way?  I am certain about that!  The only thing is that a lot of people don’t believe this!

If I think about the body I have it’s  an amazing tool and it is totally built out of natural compounds. Those compounds form molecules and the molecules form cells and those cells form organs and tissues. We exist 70% out of water. So what do you think is wrong with your body if you have a disease ( dis ease)? The answer is you miss some of the compounds your body needs. That could be Oxygen, water, sodium, calcium, iron or name it. Where do we find those compounds? Around us in the nature. So all those compounds we need like Vitamin C is a natural molecule and that is not made. It is also not possible to patent on that compound so not possible to earn millions of dollars with that compound. And Vitamin D is made on our skin when the skin gets sunshine trugh it. If we don’t have enough vitamin D that is transported through the skin and becomes vitamin D3 that is the pre-cursor for the immune system. The immune system is very important to protect you from all kinds of diseases and that means also the big diseases like cancer and AIDS. If you don’t have enough vitamine D you will get very easy the Flu. If you live in a country with cold winters your skin is always covered and not getting enough sunshine to your skin. You need to take vitamin D3 to get enough vitamin D3 to have a good working immune system that will work to eliminate the bacteria, viruses and cells in your body not doing what they should do (cancer cells).

The problem is that we think that what doctors are telling us is what we should do! And you know what that the daily dosis that the doctor subscribe we should have off vitamin D3 is only just enough to stay healthy just enough to survive. But if we take more we are a lot healthier and we have less chance to get cancer. Vitamin C is also very important to get lots of it because this molecule is a very important anti-oxidant. An anti-oxidant takes free radicals away from example  our DNA that if they stay there they will damage the DNA that can result in cancer. These vitamins are essential in our diet. And they can also cure cancer.

I am surprised if I tell people struggling with cancer that they don’t believe this. I can’t understand that they don’t want to try or use it together (at the moment they get this advice) I would have done that at the moment I had heard it when my son was still alive and struggling and fighting his cancer. I was looking for a natural way to cure his cancer. But I didn’t know and the oncologists I had didn’t know! (Or did they?)

This is a sign that the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies did a good job! Hide the natural ways to cure cancer and a lot of other diseases! I did find a lot of ways to cure cancer (most, some need really to be cured on a regular way) and I have one at my place to use right away or to give it away to start immidiately if it is necessary.I promised myself that I would find a cure for myself and my loved ones at the time my son was suffering his treatment for cancer surgery, radiation and chemo. I saw my son and I realized that the treatment they gave him was only poison. Things that are really not done on living cells. When I was investigating living cells in the labaratory and seeing how those cells where changing when I added cytokines I saw what the healthy and cancer cells in the body of my son went thrugh. I had again that question in my head “How is it possible to cure cancer with poison?”  I could not believe in a cure of cancer with poison, radiation and surgery (sometimes surgery is needed). I was confused, because I was still looking for a way to cure myself and my loved ones for if!  I quit the study at the university and started to work on myself and than I found a few books on the internet and I started to read and read and I was so glad that I can finally say I have found a cure for myself.

But at the time I found the cure one of my loved ones was diagnosed with lung cancer and he did not want to try and two other members of my family didn’t want to try either! This was a real painful answer for me, but I have to respect  their choice, but it hurts. I want to share this with you in the hope you see that it is important to inform yourself before you need this because you have cancer. Because all the pressure around you and your fear of the diagnosis will make that you will choose to go for the regular treatments. But what if it would work and you would be Free of Cancer with a little time and also easy to do. You will save a lot of hospital visits and you will win a lot of time.

On my blog on the left side you can find the  book and links: I recommend books  I have found with important information about this subject and also  ways to cure diseases and cancer.  I am not able to copy that from the books so on those links you will find the websites where you can order those books they are most of the times as an e-book. So you can read them right away after purchasing them. Do yourself and your loved ones a favor and start to read about how healthy care is organized these days and more important how to become or stay healthy!Cancer, Immune system

Technorati Tags: AIDS, bacteria, cells, immune system, natural compounds, natural way, organs, Oxygen, viruses, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, water

July 6th, 2011 at 7:51 pm
Posted By: admin
Posted in: what to drink or eat!

Citizens are irate that the FDA allows damaging junk food, but prevents people from making an educated, informed food choice in purchasing raw grass-fed milk. This is also the way I feel about this subject. I would like to drink raw milk, because the raw milk is filled with proteins that are not broken by heating and therefore a lot more useful in our body. In that milk there is so much that we should have on daily basis to stay healthy. But it is not allowed anymore. Why? I think you will become better informed with the next article Dr. Mercola wrote I like to share with you!

Inform yourself and decide for yourself what would be best for us humans. I think that our body is capable to heal itself when necessary if we get the nutrients that our body needs!

FDA Says: Drinking This Natural Food is a Crime

On May 16th, Representative Ron Paul asked,

“If we are not even free anymore to decide something as basic as what we wish to eat or drink, how much freedom do we really have left?”

Paul was talking about the FDA ban on the interstate sale of raw milk for human consumption — milk that has not been pasteurized. The ban began in 1987, but the FDA didn’t really begin enforcing it seriously until 2006 — when the government began sting operations and armed raids of dairy farmers and their willing customers.

The New American reports:

“Even if the FDA were correct in its assertions about the dangers of raw milk, its prohibition on interstate raw milk sales would still be, as Paul termed it, ‘an unconstitutional misapplication of the commerce clause for legislative ends’ …

Saying he is ‘outraged’ by the FDA’s raids on peaceful dairy farmers and their customers, Paul has introduced legislation … ‘to allow the shipment and distribution of unpasteurized milk and milk products for human consumption across state lines,’ in effect reversing the FDA’s unconstitutional ban on such sales.”

The “Food Safety Modernization Act” that was enacted earlier this year gives the FDA almost unlimited authority to decide if food is harmful, even without credible evidence. But farmers who have been persecuted by the FDA for selling raw milk, like Amish Farmer Dan Allgyer, are not backing down. Allgyer’s case is going to court.

Citizens are irate that the FDA allows damaging junk food, but prevents people from making an educated, informed food choice in purchasing raw grass-fed milk.

According to the Washington Times, Attorney Jonathan Emord, who has defeated the FDA in court eight times, is focusing on the deeper issues that this case stems from. Emord says:

“We would not be here today were it not for the fact that over the past seventy-five years, the Congress of the United States has delegated away to some 230 independent regulatory commissions the power to make law, the power to execute the law, and the power to judge law violation. That delegation of governing power from Congress to the unelected heads of the regulatory agencies violates the Constitution, which vests exclusively in Congress the obligation to make law”.

The New American May 20, 2011
The Washington Times May 25, 2011

Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

Follow Dr. Mercola on Twitter Follow Dr. Mercola on Facebook

The war on raw milk, which is really an unconstitutional assault on one of your most basic rights, i.e. your right to choose what you want to eat and drink, is now in full swing and will likely intensify in the days ahead.

Amish Farmer Raided at Gun Point

Dan Allgyer, an Amish farmer, was recently caught in an FDA sting operation, after the agency planted a spy in local buying club he supplies, “Grassfed On The Hill”, back in October of 2009 to gather evidence against him. His farm was raided at gun point, and eventually the Department of Justice, at the behest of FDA, filed suit in Federal District Court to obtain an injunction prohibiting Allgyer from transporting and selling raw milk across state lines.

This isn’t the first time the FDA has spent US tax dollars to violently clamp down on “illegal interstate commerce,” by raw milk farmers, all under the guise of doing their job and protecting the public’s health…

Any level-headed person would argue that this is a poorly shrouded sham, seeing how the FDA has continuously allowed known toxins into the food supply, and those who willingly choose to harm their health are free to do so by consuming too much sugar, artificial non-food-based items, alcohol, and toxic cigarettes.

Logic notwithstanding, food safety chief and former Monsanto lawyer Michael Taylor recently defended the FDA’s spying and gun-toting tactics against raw milk producers, stating that they’re simply doing their job, calling the campaign “a public health duty” based on “statutory directive.” And it may actually get worse than it already is, if we don’t stop it. A recent article in the San Francisco Chronicle explains:

“The FDA is in the midst of writing the critical regulations that will implement the Food Safety Modernization Act Congress passed last year with applause all around from the Obama administration, Democrats and Republicans despite ferocious opposition from small-farm advocates. The sweeping new law gives the agency extraordinary powers to detain foods on farms. It also denies farmers recourse to federal courts.

On July 3, the agency will issue its new rule to detain any food it believes is unsafe, or, more critically, “mislabeled.” In Allgyer’s case, the entire FDA case rests on a technical violation of a ban on interstate commerce in raw milk and alleged mislabeling.

Before the new law, the FDA could only impound food when it had credible evidence the food was contaminated or posed a public health hazard. The detention powers are part of what Taylor described as a new agency focus on preventing food poisoning outbreaks rather than responding to them after the fact. Taylor described the new law as giving the agency “farm to table” control over food safety.”

Taylor also stated that he will seek a “high rate of compliance” with the new rules. Compliance will be made all the more “effective” once the FDA gets its new and improved tool kit of enforcement, which will include:

* Access to farm records
* Mandatory recall authority
* New administrative enforcement actions
* Ability to revoke a farm’s mandatory registration (which will be a new requirement under the law)

Support Bill to Legalize Your Right to Choose!

Allgyer taking on the FDA in court is a classic case of David vs. Goliath. At stake is the issue of consumer choice and food freedom — something most people would agree is an absolute, basic, and unalienable right.

The case has even brought the ire and attention of Congressman Ron Paul (TX), who in response introduced House Bill HR 1830: To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and milk products that are packaged for direct human consumption.

The incident is just one in a long string of raids on small farms, indicating that the FDA is quite serious about its attempt to eliminate food freedom for all Americans. And as feared, the “Food Safety Modernization Act,” which was enacted earlier this year, gives the FDA the jurisdiction and near unlimited authority to single-handedly decide if a food is harmful, without having to produce credible evidence to support their case.

Ron Paul’s bill would undo at least some of the damage, as it would make it legal for farmers to sell and distribute raw milk across state lines to those who wish to obtain it.

I cannot urge you strongly enough to support Ron Paul’s bill, HR 1830, and inform everyone you know. This issue has nothing to do with whether or not you want to drink raw milk, and everything to do with whether or not you want the right to choose what you feed your family. If we allow the US government to remove our right to raw milk, who knows what’s next?!

They could decide you don’t have the right to obtain or eat fresh vegetables, or no right to buy or drink water.

Sound ludicrous? So is the idea that you do not have the right to drink raw milk, a natural food that has been consumed for thousands of years and has proven health benefits. Considering the fact that we’ve seen more and more outbreaks of the rare virulent forms of E.coli and other pathogens being traced back to fresh produce, I see no reason why the FDA might not decide to make fresh vegetables illegal. Ditto for water, as water shortages may eventually become a reality, prompting the need to dramatically curb water consumption, and what better means than by force of law backed up with firepower?

The Farm-to-Consumer Defense Fund has created a petition page for HR 1830 that also automatically faxes your message to your US Senators and House Representative. You can even choose to send your message to your nearest daily newspaper.

I urge you to take a moment to sign the petition right now!

How Did We Get to This Point?

During a recent peaceful demonstration in D.C. in support of Allgyer, attorney Jonathan Emord explained how we got to the point where we must now FIGHT for our right to ingest a healthful food.

“We would not be here today were it not for the fact that over the past 75 years, the Congress of the United States has delegated away to some 230 independent regulatory commissions the power to make law, the power to execute the law, and the power to judge law violation. That delegation of governing power from Congress to the unelected heads of the regulatory agencies violates the Constitution, which vests exclusively in Congress the obligation to make law.

Nine-tenths of all laws are no longer the product of our elected representatives; they are created by the unelected heads of the bureaucratic agencies. Those agency heads are unaccountable to the courts, the Congress, and the American people. One such agency that engages in this unconstitutional governance is the Food and Drug Administration. It is the action of that agency that we examine today, because it offends the very foundation of liberty of our Republic.”

In short, we as Americans have failed to keep our eyes on the ball. We grew complacent; lulled into non-action and non-participation by the illusion that “Government is taking care of our needs.”

Meanwhile, our rights to life, liberty and freedom have eroded away, and this is the end result: An agency of the government, paid for by your tax dollars and the drug industry, claims you have no inherent human right to eat any particular food. Yes. That’s not a misinterpretation. They now declared that this is exactly their position, and it’s written in black and white…

FDA Claims to have God-Like Authority Over Your Life

Attorneys for the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF, a not for profit organization founded to protect the right of farmers and consumers to engage in direct commerce) helped to draft the text of HR 1830. FTCLDF has also filed a lawsuit against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on behalf of eight plaintiffs, challenging the legality of the FDA ban on interstate distribution of raw milk for human consumption.

FTCLDF president, Pete Kennedy, stressed that the FDA is making it clear that even individual consumers crossing state lines to purchase raw milk and bringing it back to their home state are violating the law. The ban is not just limited to farmers selling the milk.

On April 26, 2010, the FDA submitted its initial response to this lawsuit, in which the FTCLDF asserts the unconstitutionality of the ban on raw milk in interstate commerce. In its answer, the FDA clearly states its position on the “freedom of food choice” in general, and your right to obtain and consume raw milk in particular. Their answer reads in part:

* “Plaintiffs’ assertion of a new ‘fundamental right’ to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law.” [p. 4]
* “It is within HHS’s authority . . . to institute an intrastate ban [on unpasteurized milk] as well.” [p. 6]
* “Plaintiffs’ assertion of a new ‘fundamental right’ under substantive due process to produce, obtain, and consume unpasteurized milk lacks any support in law.” [p.17]
* “There is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular food.” [p. 25]
* “There is no ‘deeply rooted’ historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds.” [p. 26]
* “Plaintiffs’ assertion of a ‘fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families’ is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish.” [p. 26]… “Even if such a right did exist, it would not render FDA’s regulations unconstitutional because prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk promotes bodily and physical health.” [p. 27]
* “There is no fundamental right to freedom of contract.” [p. 27]

Essentially, while the fight currently revolves around your right to obtain and consume raw milk, the FDA claims to have the power to restrict your access to any kind of food it deems harmful, because you have no fundamental right to obtain and eat any particular food whatsoever!

The statements made by the FDA truly challenge the rational mind and rattle the core of any freedom-loving soul.

Aside from the fact that most people assume they have the right to ingest any food they see fit, United States law has also given us the freedom to enter into private contracts as we choose. In the case of raw milk, increasing numbers of people have elected to obtain their milk through contractual arrangements such as buyers club agreements and herdshare contracts. Here, the FDA claims that there is no fundamental right to freedom of contract in the United States!

As the FTCLDF states on its website:

“As for the agency’s contention that there is no fundamental right to obtain any food, including raw milk, here is what the ‘substantive due process’ clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: no person shall “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”

Obtaining the foods of your choice is so basic to life, liberty and property that it is inconceivable that the ‘right of food choice’ would not be protected under the Constitution…”

Kentucky Raw Milk Consumers Get a Rude Awakening

A recent blog post by Kimberly Hartke highlights the sense of shock felt when people suddenly realize that the government’s over-reach now affects them personally. A food club based in Louisville, Kentucky recently got a visit from the county health inspector, who promptly issued a cease and desist order when he saw that raw milk was being sold. He also placed all the milk on the premises under quarantine.

The members of the club have leased cows from a Kentucky dairy farm and have ownership rights in the milk produced. To say they were shocked when they were told they could not pick up their personal property would be an understatement, but once the fear subsided, they turned angry, and then resolve set in.

Hartke quotes one of the club members, Dr. Joslin:

“We had heard about government actions against other farmers, but it didn’t hit home until last Friday. My wife turned to me and said, ‘we could lose our milk, and I am ready to fight this’.”

She goes on to write:

“When asked how he felt about the health inspector’s visit, he said, “I felt violated. This is my freedom, my choice. You don’t have any right to tell me that I can’t feed my family something that has been consumed all over the world for thousands of years. Pasteurization is something new, in fact, fresh milk may be more commonly consumed worldwide, than processed milk.”

More than 90 percent of the club members responded to the threat by ignoring the quarantine and picking up their milk. But they also signed a document of their own. Affirming their legal right to enter into private contracts, their document included the following passages from the Kentucky Constitution:

Section 1: Rights of life, liberty, worship, pursuit of safety and happiness, free speech, acquiring and protecting property, peaceable assembly, redress of grievances, bearing arms. Section 10: The people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions, from unreasonable search and seizure; and no warrant shall issue to search any place, or seize any person or thing, without describing them as nearly as may be, nor without probable cause supported by oath or affirmation.

Section 19: No ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be enacted. Section 26: To guard against transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, We Declare that everything in this Bill of Rights is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate; and all laws contrary thereto, or contrary to this Constitution, shall be void.

Hartke goes on to write:

“Dr. Joslin and his wife are typical of the consumers that choose local, fresh milk to feed their families. They are well educated, they did a tremendous amount of research before making the transition, and they had a compelling health reason (their children) to do so. They also are typical in the sense that they believe in the American ideals of personal liberty and right to private property, limited government.

“I do not hate our government or system of government,” stresses Joslin, “Rather, I am a patriot, a flag waver, and I thank our veterans. But, my priority is to protect my family’s liberty. I will not lie down.”

Motives, Misconceptions, and Ignorance

“The ban on raw milk crossing state lines is an economic regulation disguised as a health regulation,” Pete Kennedy points out. For those who cannot understand what this has to do with economics, you must understand that Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO’s) simply cannot compete with grassfed raw milk farms, and therefore stand to lose a lot of money as raw milk becomes increasingly popular.

They cannot compete because in order for milk to be safely consumed raw, it should come from cows fed a forage based diet that includes pasture. CAFO-derived milk should not be consumed raw given the elevated risk of hazardous pathogens in the milk—an inevitable side effect of the environment in which these cows are raised.

The reason why they’re trying to shut down raw milk farmers is because so many people consume raw milk and raw milk dairy products, and the numbers are growing every year. One 2008 survey conducted by the CDC found there were over nine million raw milk drinkers in the US, and today, the number of raw milk consumers is estimated to be in the neighborhood of 12-13 million. When you consider that each family can consume a few gallons of milk per week, it all starts adding up, and Big Dairy is losing business.

Additionally, Kennedy stated that raw milk can be a “gateway to small farm prosperity”. Families who initially set foot on the farm to obtain raw milk typically end up purchasing other farm products such as produce, eggs, poultry and meat.

The CDC’s study also highlights the error of the claim that raw milk poses a significant health risk. With that many millions of raw milk consumers, it’s quite clear that grassfed raw milk is extremely safe, because there are so few foodborne illness outbreaks attributable to it.

Lastly, but perhaps most importantly, while the FDA has the authority to declare foods safe or unsafe, they do not have experts in their employ with the intellectual aptitude to find the relevant research and data to help them understand the food. It’s quite clear that the FDA still has no understanding whatsoever of the differences between the production of raw milk intended for pasteurization by a CAFO or other conventional dairy and the production of raw milk intended for direct human consumption by a small farm.

Conventional CAFO milk must be pasteurized in order to conform to the distribution process and elimination of the elevated risk of pathogens that are present because of the conditions in which the cows are kept. But milk from a healthy cow that is fed a balanced diet that includes pasture and has access to clean and comfortable shelter has a lower risk of a pathogen presence and has a different quality profile than that of CAFO milk.

FDA enforcement actions have not been limited to raw milk farmers. Recently the agency cost award-winning cheese makers Kelly and Anthony Estrella their business.

Without a shred of evidence that her hand-crafted cheeses had made anyone sick, the FDA was able to shut down the Estrella Family Creamery based on environmental and cheese sample test results that were positive for the bacteria Listeria monocytogenes (L. mono.). There are many subtypes of L. mono., most have not been found to cause illness in humans. Instead of determining whether the L. mono. found at the creamery was a virulent subtype—something the FDA had the capability to do—the FDA shut down the dairy through a seizure order without any further testing.

And so, the agency put out of business cheesemakers that had won numerous awards both in the US and internationally based on nothing more than a misconceived suspicion that her methods of cheese production and storage might be “unsanitary.” Never mind the fact that high-quality raw cheeses MUST undergo certain fermentation processes and storage conditions in order to encourage the growth of beneficial bacteria and so on…

Cheese making is an art form that has been perfected over numerous generations, the products from which have been consumed and valued for their superior taste and nutrition for ages. The FDA has considered raising the aging requirement for raw cheese from sixty days to ninety days further limiting the amount and variety of raw cheeses in this country. Europe has no aging requirement.

But according to the FDA, you don’t have the right to eat high-quality unpasteurized cheese—because they say so.

Farmageddon Premiere

Farmageddon: The Unseen War on American Family Farms is a documentary by Kristin Canty that will likely make the government’s overreach an even hotter topic. It premiered on June 17 at the West End Theater in Washington D.C. For a full list of scheduled venues, please see the film’s screening page.

The film’s synopsis reads in part:

Farmageddon tells the story of small, family farms that were providing safe, healthy foods to their communities and were forced to stop, sometimes through violent action, by agents of misguided government bureaucracies, and seeks to figure out why.

… Instead of focusing on the source of food safety problems — most often the industrial food chain — policymakers and regulators implement and enforce solutions that target and often drive out of business small farms that have proven themselves more than capable of producing safe, healthy food, but buckle under the crushing weight of government regulations and excessive enforcement actions.

Farmageddon highlights the urgency of food freedom, encouraging farmers and consumers alike to take action to preserve individuals’ rights to access food of their choice…”

I encourage you to view this film if you can. The DVD release is expected in the late fall or winter.

I also encourage you to consider making a donation to the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF). This 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization enables targeted farmers to keep their businesses open, whereas they would otherwise have no choice but to close down due to insurmountable legal and financial pressure. Your donations, although not tax deductible, will be used to support the litigation, legislative, and lobbying efforts of the FTCLDF.

Additional Action Alert!

I also want to alert you to yet another related and important action item, namely the natural versus industrial trans fat labeling in restaurant food. There’s a provision in the new health care act that requires nutrition labeling of standardized menu selections at restaurant chains with 20 or more locations.

The FDA is currently accepting public comment for this proposed regulation, which would require natural and healthy trans fats from ruminant animals to be labeled in the same manner as health-damaging industrial health fats such as partially hydrogenated vegetable oil.

As explained by the Weston A Price Foundation:

“Partially hydrogenated vegetable oil contains harmful trans fat, known to increase the risk of heart disease, cancer and type two diabetes. But ruminant animals (cows, sheep, goats) also make trans fat, which is stored in their fat and butterfat. Ruminant trans fat is transformed into conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) which can prevent cancer and has other health benefits.

Because there is little or no cooked meat in most packaged foods, and because serving sizes are modest, the ruminant trans fat present in these foods is usually less than 0.5g per serving. Below this amount the trans fat is labeled as 0g per serving. But a hamburger made with a quarter pound of 20 percent fat ground beef has a trans fat level of about 0.6g. And with a slice of cheese it is 0.8g. The fat in beef has about 5 percent trans fat and milk fat has about 3.5 percent.

As proposed, the trans fat in natural animal fats will be declared on menus. This is because the regulations make no distinction between industrial and ruminant trans fat..

In Europe, the regulations do not mandate trans fat labeling for ruminant trans fats, as scientists there recognize the difference between healthy trans fats in butter and meat fat, and unhealthy industrial trans fats.”

The FDA is accepting public comments through July 5. I urge you to contact the FDA and voice your concerns. Please tell the FDA that all trans fat is NOT the same. A new category: “Industrial trans fat” should replace trans fat for nutrition labeling as this would not subject healthy ruminant fats to pejorative labeling.

To submit a comment electronically, please follow these instructions:

1. Open the website www.regulations.gov, and click Submit a Comment.
2. Enter docket number FDA-2011-F-0172 in the keyword space.
3. Click Search.
4. Go to the far right on the screen labeled 1 result for FDA-2011-F-0172 and click submit a comment.

You may also submit your comment via U.S. Postal Service:

Send your letter to:

The Division of Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fisher Lane
Rockville, MD 20852

It is important to write the docket number FDA-2011-F-0172 on each page.

Related articles:
Choosing Between Raw Milk and a Dead, White Liquid
The Witch-Hunt that’s Taking it To One of America’s Healthiest Food Choices…
The War Over Raw Milk Heats Up

PS: The links will only work if you are a member of Dr. Mercola’s website (for free) so if you are interested in more
information about this or you want to read more about Health you should subscribe on his website! And I am sure
you will be amazed about the information he gives about natural health and what is important to stay healthy!
That is why I did not put the links or the articles in this article.

Technorati Tags: beneficial bacteria, CAFO milk, Dr. Mercola, FDA, food freedom, food safety, Food safety Modernization Act, freedom of food choice, FTCLDF, Government is taking care of our needs, grassfed raw milk, losing business, nonprofit organization, proven health benefits, public health hazard, raw chees, raw cheeses, raw milk, The Farm-to-Consumer Defense Fund, unpasteurized milk, US government

June 17th, 2011 at 10:55 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: vitamine B-17

I want to share a website with you all! This website is writing about Vitamin B17  the Vitamin that is also very important for our body to prevent cancer and if it is to late to cure cancer. The website has an easy to understand and it contains all I know about B17. On this website you can also order this vitamin!
The text below is some text from that website to inform you about Vitamin B-17.

In the Himalayan Mountains in Pakistan, there is a land called Hunza where the inhabitants live to be 120 years old. After years of study these people, medical personnel have yet to report a case of cancer in any one individual. They do not suffer from heart disease, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or any of the major chronic diseases which takes the lives of so many people in our society today. Medical scientists are unable to explain or should I say, refuse to explain why these people are free of cancer when our loved ones are dying from it everyday.
The average Hunza diet contains over 200 times more vitamin B-17 than the average diet of industrialized societies. Of all the food that they grow and eat, the apricot is by far their favorite. In fact a Hunza apricot seeds family’s economic status is measured by the number of apricot trees they possess. Apricots serve the Hunzakuts a number of purposes: using the fruit as food, eating the seeds as nuts, grinding the seeds to extract the oil, which is used for cooking, salad dressing, and even as face lotion for the women.
Apricots kernels are very high in nitrilosides or vitamin B-17, which was proven as a preventative measure for cancer by Dr Krebs since 1950. Dr. Ernest Krebs claimed that when consumed on a regular basis, Vitamin B-17 prevents the body from developing cancer, and also fights existing cases of the disease.

How Does vitamin B-17 Work to kill cancer?

Cancer cells differ in a number of ways from normal cells. We know that unlike normal cells that burn oxygen and glucose for energy, cancer cells burn only glucose, creating lactic acid and carbon monoxide instead of carbon dioxide and water.

A vitamin B-17 molecule contains two units of glucose (sugar), one of the benzaldehyde, and one of cyanide, all tightly locked together. Cancer cells contain an enzyme called beta-glucosidase, which is usually hundreds of times the level found in normal, healthy cells. When vitamin B-17 is taken into the body, it comes into contact with the glucosidase, which breaks down the vitamin B-17. This releases the cyanide and benzaldehyde, which then poisons the cancer cells. Normal healthy cells are not affected because they contain an enzyme called rhodanese, which inactivate the cyanide and converts it into thiocyanate, a substance which helps the body regulate blood pressure. The cancer cells die because do not possess this important enzyme rhodanese and therefore cannot be protected.

It is true that cyanide can be lethal if taken in large doses just like water can also be if consumed in too large a quantity. Opponents of vitamin B-17 will claim that it contains cyanide and should not be ingested for fear of poisoning. We learned that the vitamin B-17 molecule produces cyanide when it is broken down, but the only enzyme, which can do this is beta-glucosidase, only found in cancer cells.

Do you also know that vitamin B-12, contains cyanide in the same way that vitamin B-17 does? A deficiency of vitamin B-12 can lead to anemia, fatigue, and depression, while a long term deficiency can potentially cause permanent damage to the brain and central nervous system. Foods containing vitamin B-12 include liver, caviar (fish eggs), fish, beef, lam cheese, and eggs.

Is there anyone nobody in their right mind that would tell you not to consume vitamin B-12?

A few questions to think about

How many cases have you heard of people who died using drugs that were approved by the FDA?

Have you ever heard of someone who died because they ate apricot seeds?

Do the Hunzakuts in the Himalayan mountains in Pakistan die from eating apricots seeds?

On the contrary they never suffer of cancer and have an average life expectancy which is 20 to 30 years longer than ours.

In the Cancer News Journal, May/August, 1970 Dr. Krebs said, “These nitrilosides just might be to cancer what vitamin C is to scurvy, what niacin is to pellagra, what vitamin B12 and folic acid are to pernicious anemia.”

Wouldn’t you agree with this statement after all the evidence given you?

Vitamin B-17 is known as Laetrile

Laetrile tabletsVitamin B17 is commercially known as Amygdalin or Laetrile. Amygdalin is a naturally occurring substance found in the some fruits and vegetables and particularly high in apricot seeds and bitter almonds. Some people call Laetrile vitamin B17, although it is not a vitamin. Dr. Ernst Krebs, also promoted it as Vitamin B17 and recommended it as a treatment for cancer.

As expected the FDA has placed a list of restrictions against Laetrile, making it very difficult for websites to sell it or you as a customer to acquire it. In a sense the FDA has used regulations, not law, to prohibit the interstate shipment and sale of Laetrile by declaring it an “unlicensed new drug” even though it is not. This would therefore restrict the use of Laetrile because the FDA has to permit the use of anything classified as a drug, and we both know that they will not allow that. In some states however, doctors are allowed to use vitamin B-17 as metabolic therapy, as long as they don’t claim that it can cure cancer.

Have a drug ever cured you of a disease? Didn’t think so.

How to use vitamin B-17 to treat from cancer

From the book, World Without Cancer by Edward Griffin, the most effective method of Laetrile treatment has been six to nine thousand milligrams intravenously daily, usually given for three weeks. Generally, it takes an accumulation of fifty to seventy thousand milligrams over a period of about a week or ten days before the patient can report tangible indications of improvement. Laetrile can also be taken orally, but bacteria in the intestines can cause small amounts of cyanide to be released and for this reason it is usually suggested that oral doses be limited to 3 grams per day.

The Contreras Hospital in Tijuana, Mexico also known as The Oasis of Hope Hospital has been treating cancer with Laetrile since 1963. They use a protocol which involves administering 3 grams of laetrile intravenously daily, six days per week, for two to three weeks. The frequency of intravenous administration is gradually decreased, and oral tablets are used as the patient improves.

We want to remind you that intravenous administration of Laetrile should be done by a qualified person. Any nurse or doctor can simply make a house visit and administer this form of B-17. It is completely safe and non-toxic and does not produce any side effects.
Laetrile is most effective when it is used as part of a nutritional or metabolic therapy, which involves the administration of other vitamins, certain enzymes, and a diet from which animal protein has been mostly remove.
The purpose of metabolic therapy is mainly to restore wellness. Unfortunately, most cancer patients only seek alternative medicine after their bodies have suffered extensive damage due to the effects of chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or the cancer itself. Because of this, other nutrients should be considered to help significantly in restoring wellness.
Using vitamin B-17 for cancer Prevention

In the book World Without Cancer, the author G. Edward Griffin strongly recommended the use of vitamin B17 for cancer treatment and prevention. Someone who is pre-disposed to cancer would require more, and one who already has the disease would need much more. Dr Krebs suggested that the raw form of vitamin B-17(apricot seeds) is better than the purified form (Laetrile) when used for prevention. He advised that eating about seven apricot kernels per day is an excellent way of preventing cancer. In the USA there is about 4-5mg of vitamin B-17 in every apricot seed, although at times this figure can vary.

My brother who was once diagnosed with leukemia consumes about 6-8 apricots seeds along with one of the 100 milligram B-17 tablets every day. Myself, the webmaster consumes about seven apricot seeds daily to prevent cancer. The apricot seeds tastes very bitter, so you can use a coffee grinder to grind the seeds and swallow them in capsule form.

We encourage you to take responsibility for your life and health. The truth is that cancer has now become a business and as Edward Griffin said, “Today there are more people making a living from cancer than dying from it.” Don’t be deceived by the various medical authorities when they claim to be working hard at finding a cure for cancer. The cure is available and has always been there. Because of their love of money, those who claim to be concerned with our health, has kept us in darkness and on the brink of death, in an endeavor to make more of it.

Technorati Tags: Amygdalin, beta-glucosidase, cancer cells, central nervous system, cyanide, diabetes, enzym rhodanese, free of cancer, heart diseasse, hypertension, Leatrile, obesity, Oxygen, prevent cancer, regulate blood pressure, to cure cancer, treatment for cancer, Vitamin B 17, vitamin B-17 as metabolic therapy

November 23rd, 2010 at 10:57 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: what to drink or eat!

I want to share an article of Dr. Mercola. He is writing about the sweetener Splenda and how Splenda is harming our Health and the Health of Fish,  animals and plants on our planet earth! All the people consuming this product are poisining the water on this planet and all on it, because we all and all plants and trees are using water!

Did You Know that Splenda is

in Your Drinking Water?

The human body can’t break it down, or use it in any way. And as it turns out, modern wastewater treatment methods don’t break down Splenda either.

Smitha Ramakrishna, a finalist in the 2009 Intel Science Talent Search, found that the sweetener can accumulate in the water supply after people excrete it. This could potentially cause harm to fish and other living creatures.

Scientific American reports:

“She tried to start doing research at Arizona State University, though since she was the first high schooler her lab had ever had … [E]ventually she was allowed to subject sucralose to various treatments, like bacterial digestion, typically used in wastewater treatment plants.

She found that sucralose resisted most of these treatments … that means almost all the sucralose people eat or drink winds up in the ecosystem.”


Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

Splenda (aka sucralose) was approved by the FDA in 1998 as a tabletop sweetener and for use in products such as baked goods, nonalcoholic beverages, chewing gum, frozen dairy desserts, fruit juices, and gelatins. Sucralose is also permitted as a general-purpose sweetener for all processed foods.

It’s become very popular over the last decade as it’s claimed your body does not metabolize it and therefore provides no calories.

As I detailed in my book Sweet Deception, researchers have found evidence that Splenda is absorbed by your fat, contrary to claims. This is not good as it will tend to accumulate in your body over time. Since it is chemically related to DDT and no study in the world has looked at toxicity over a few months, it might lead a prudent person to be more cautious with its use.

However, a significant amount is still excreted in your stool and this is what winds up in the water supply.

Is Excreted Splenda Accumulating in the Water Supply?

According to Splenda’s Web site for health care professionals:

“Approximately 2% of ingested sucralose is biotransformed into toxicologically insignificant components and excreted in the urine … Most ingested sucralose is eliminated unchanged in the stool … Of the small amount of sucralose that is absorbed, most is eliminated in the urine within 24 hours.”

All of this excreted Splenda goes directly into the water supply where Smitha Ramakrishna, a bright 17-year-old and finalist in the 2009 Intel Science Talent Search, found that wastewater treatment methods do not break the compound down.

After testing bacterial digestion and other forms of common wastewater treatments, she found the molecule vastly unchanged. Only a mix of titanium dioxide, ultraviolet light and extensive time broke Splenda down into biodegradable molecules, and these methods are rarely used by treatment facilities.

So there’s a good chance that Splenda is readily accumulating in water supplies, where preliminary studies suggest it could poison fish and potentially harm other creatures as well.

The fastest solution to keeping Splenda out of the water supply would be to drastically cut down on its use on a nationwide level … a step that would not only protect the environment but also your individual health as well.

Splenda Secrets You Should Know

Splenda was approved after the FDA supposedly reviewed more than 110 animal and human safety studies, but out of these 110 studies, only two were human studies, and the longest one was conducted for four days!

Those animal studies revealed plenty of problems, such as:

  • Decreased red blood cells — sign of anemia — at levels above 1,500 mg/kg/day
  • Increased male infertility by interfering with sperm production and vitality, as well as brain lesions at higher doses
  • Enlarged and calcified kidneys (McNeil stated this is often seen with poorly absorbed substances and was of no toxicological significance. The FDA Final Rule agreed that these are findings that are common in aged female rats and are not significant.)
  • Spontaneous abortions in nearly half the rabbit population given sucralose, compared to zero aborted pregnancies in the control group
  • A 23 percent death rate in rabbits, compared to a 6 percent death rate in the control group

A recent study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health also found that Splenda:

  • Reduces the amount of good bacteria in your intestines by 50 percent — a disturbing finding since these bacteria help maintain your body’s overall balance of friendly versus unfriendly microorganisms and support your general health.
  • Increases the pH level in your intestines
  • Affects a glycoprotein in your body that can have crucial health effects, particularly if you’re on certain medications

I created a page many years ago that contains a long list of personal case studies from readers who have been injured and suffered side effects from Splenda.

In fact, we have more people on our site that have reported adverse reactions to Splenda than were formally studied in the research submitted for FDA approval! Please read these case reports when you can and certainly add your own experience if you have noticed a side effect from consuming Splenda.

The symptoms are so numerous I can’t include them all here, but the following are common symptoms, usually noticed within a 24-hour period following consumption of Splenda products:

  • Skin — Redness, itching, swelling, blistering, weeping, crusting, rash, eruptions, or hives (itchy bumps or welts). These are the most common allergic symptoms that people have.
  • Lungs — Wheezing, tightness, cough, or shortness of breath
  • Head — Swelling of the face, eyelids, lips, tongue, or throat; headaches and migraines (severe headaches)
  • Nose — Stuffy nose, runny nose (clear, thin discharge), sneezing
  • Eyes — Red (bloodshot), itchy, swollen, or watery
  • Stomach — Bloating, gas, pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or bloody diarrhea
  • Heart — Palpitations or fluttering
  • Joints — Joint pains or aches
  • Neurological — Anxiety, dizziness, spaced-out sensation, depression

Tips for Ditching Splenda

You may become addicted to artificial sweeteners because you have cravings for sweets and think you are making a healthy choice by swapping out sugar for artificial sweeteners … but this is a myth.

For more information about why artificial sweeteners are not a smart health move (for instance did you know they can actually stimulate fat storage and weight gain?) read One More Reason to Ban Artificial Sweeteners from Your Diet.

If you’re using Splenda because you’re craving sweets, what your body is most likely really craving are healthy nutrients. Finding out your nutritional type will help you understand which foods you need to eat to feel full and satisfied. Once you start eating right for your nutritional type, your sweet cravings typically will significantly lessen and may even disappear.

Meanwhile, be sure you address the emotional component to your food cravings using a tool such as the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT). More than any traditional or alternative method I have used or researched, EFT works to overcome food cravings.

And, if diet soda is the culprit for you, be sure to check out Turbo Tapping, which is an extremely effective and simple tool to get rid of your soda addiction in a short period of time.

For times when you are looking for a healthier sweet treat, the only alternative sweetener I recommend is Stevia. It’s a natural plant and, unlike Splenda and other artificial sweeteners that have been cited for dangerous toxicities, it is a safe, natural alternative that’s ideal if you’re watching your weight or maintaining your health by avoiding sugar.

I must tell you that I am biased; I prefer Stevia as my sweetener of choice, and I frequently use it. However, like most choices, especially sweeteners, I recommend using Stevia in moderation, just like sugar.

Related Links:


using water, Artificial sweetenersStevia

Technorati Tags: Artificial sweeteners are dangerous, avoiding sugar, Bill Henderson, biotransformed, Dr. Mercola, Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT). good bacteria in your intestines, FDA approved, harmfull effects, human studies, Splenda, Splenda in your drinking water, Splenda potential harmfull effects, Stevia, sucralose, sweetener Splenda, Sweetener Stevia, using water

September 27th, 2010 at 7:28 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Cancer,Cancer Prevention,Cancer Treatments

A lot of people aren’t aware that it is possible to cure cancer without surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. They don’t know that there are a lot of alternative ways to cure cancer. I already mentioned the writer Bill Henderson of the books “How to Cure Almost Any Cancer at Home for $ 5.15 a Day” and “Cancer Free”

On his website he will take you to a series of articles on this subject. These are not a substitute for reading his book and some of the references — books, websites, etc. — I recommend. However, this short series of articles should help you to get your thinking straight as you work out a plan for overcoming your cancer.

Check it out and you will learn why it is better to cure cancer the natural way!:)

“Cancer Free” – Bill Henderson

Technorati Tags: Bill Henderson, Cancer, Cancer Free, cure cancer, cure cancer the natural way, natural treatments of cancer

September 26th, 2010 at 1:27 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Cancer Prevention,Cancer Treatments

I want to share a part of a book I am reading at the moment! “How to Cure Almost Any Cancer at Home for $ 5.15 a Day” By Bill Henderson with Andrew Scholberg. This story is for this moment very important for me, because a very dear family member is right now in the hospital with lung cancer and the doctor told him that there is nothing they can do to cure him! But the problem is that it is hard to convince people to do what is possible to cure themselves.

Doctor says, “What’s going on?
Her cancer is melting away”

One day in early 2008 Cathy bumped into a casual acquaintance named Peggy.
When Peggy mentioned that her 80-year-old mother, Beulah, was dying of lung cancer, Cathy immediately sprang into action. She grabbed a copy of my book Cancer-Free: Your Guide to Gentle, non-toxic Healing. Handing it to Peggy, she said, “I don’t know what you think about this, but it’s not a joke. Turn to the chapter about the diet, and read the rest later.”
On March 10, 2008, a doctor had given Peggy’s mother Beulah a death sentence, telling her, “We have no treatment for you. You have six months to live.” The doctor made it crystal clear that there was no hope whatsoever. Beulah calmly told the doctor, “The good Lord is going to heal me.” She had faith. When I interviewed Peggy by phone, she told me, “I couldn’t put your book down.” After reading it, she bought some fresh flax oil and cottage cheese and started Beulah on the Budwig protocol. Beulah also got on my healthy eating plan and later added Essiac tea to her regimen. You may recall that I mentioned Essiac tea in an earlier chapter of this Special Report.
Essiac tea is a traditional American Indian
herbal remedy for cancer. Beulah recommends the brand of Essiac brewed by Ginny Darby- Evans. It’s called “Just Tea,” and you can order it from this website: www.just-t.com. Ginny’s store is located at 449 S. Hickory Valley Rd., Sparta, TN 38585. You can also order “Just Tea” by calling (931) 946-7002.
About two weeks after getting my book from Cathy, Peggy called her with some exciting news: “The cancer doesn’t seem to
be spreading.” When Beulah’s doctor saw the improvement, he started pushing for chemo to “knock it out.” But Beulah was determined to get rid of her cancer the natural, non-toxic way. And with each subsequent visit, Beulah’s cancer kept shrinking and shrinking. The doctor kept on pushing his chemo, and Beulah kept on refusing it. The doctor was puzzled. He became unnerved! In exasperation, he wrote in Beulah’s chart that she “chose not to have any treatment.” But that wasn’t true. apparently the doctor forgot that he had told Beulah in March, “We have no treatment for you.” That was the reason Beulah turned to alternative treatments. Beulah was pleased to find natural health practitioner Penny Mill of Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. Penny gave Beulah electrodermal screening, a sophisticated method of identifying health problems.
During a follow-up examination with Beulah’s regular doctor in May, he told Peggy, “I don’t know what’s going on with your mother, but her cancer is melting away.” In June, he couldn’t see any cancer on Beulah’s X-ray. And in July, he couldn’t even find a trace of cancer in her blood. The cancer was gone. So he told Beulah, “You’re in remission.”
Beulah replied, “No, I’m not.” He answered,
“Yes, you are. When we can’t find any cancer, we say it’s in remission.” But Beulah said, “When God heals you, you’re healed.” And now that she’s committed to a healthy eating plan, she’s confident the cancer will never come back.
By Thanksgiving of 2008, the doctor was so astonished that he took Beulah’s newest x-ray to the doctor who had taken the first X-ray of her cancer in March of that same year. The doctor remarked, “This can’t be the same woman. There’s no cancer here!”
But it was the same woman. She was supposed to have died by September, according to his six-month prediction, but she had made it to Thanksgiving. And she has totally, 100 percent rid of her cancer. Furthermore, Beulah regained her health without surgery, radiation, or chemo. She’s in fine health. Peggy says, “I’m amazed when I look at my Mom.”

My clients routinely get rid of cancer using the same natural methods that Peggy’s mother used. Shouldn’t that be front-page news? Shouldn’t this story be on the evening news broadcasts of the national networks? Why does the cancer treatment industry keep these alternative treatments secret? If the cancer treatment industry is trying to perpetuate a conspiracy of silence, then it’s up to people like you and me to spread the truth far and wide. That’s the only way to break this conspiracy.

It is amazing to see that we can cure cancer just by simply change our diet! So I want to share the website where you can order this book!

Technorati Tags: alternative treatments, Bill Henderson, Bill Henderson with Andrew Scholberg, cancer is melting away, cancer treatment industry, cancer was gone, conspiracy, cottage cheese, flax oil, have six months to live, healthy eating plan, How to Cure Almost Any Cancer at Home for $ 5.15 a Day, lung cancer, non-toxic Healing, treatment, We have no treatment for you

August 9th, 2010 at 10:35 am
Posted By: admin
Posted in: Cancer Treatments

I want to explain something very important about the system in the conventional medical system The book I found yesterday is writing about this. The main question is: “Is the FDA concerned about our health or about the bankaccounts of the shareholders of the Big Pharma’s?” What do you think is the truth? I want to quote some pieces of text from the book: Step Outside the Box, written by Ty Bollinger!
– Did you know that prescription drugs kill over 100,000 Americans each and every year? Did you know that prescription drugs injure over two million Americans each and every year? These figures are straight from the Journal of the American medical Association. Could that mean that when you visit your doctor and take even a single prescription, you are playing “pharmaceutical roulette” and walking into the “Big Pharma Trap”?
– When patients begin to have additional problems, which are caused by the prescription drugs, what do they do? They head back to the doctors office where their doctor diagnoses them whith another disease or disorder. And then, the doctor gives them another prescription drug to help “fix” the problems caused by the first drug.
This is exactly what Big Pharma loves,  doctors who upsell their patients with more expensive prescription drugs! It’s the “Big Pharma Trap” “It’s pharmaceutical roulette!” What is the result?
Higher earnings per share! Of course! And the cycle continues…… one prescription after another, like boxcars on a train. Finally, the patient is broke and suffering (or dead) from chemical toxicity resulting from prescription drugs.

“welcome to the town of Allopath” a little story that explains what is happening in the conventional medical world!

Over the past century, hundreds of caring, concerned, and conscientious alternative doctors and herbalists have been treated like common criminals for the “crime”of curing people of terminal diseases in an unapproved manner by heavy-handed government agents who swoop down on clinics with machine guns and body armor. Posture themselves before TV cameras and the public under the ludicrous pretens of being servants of the people and protectors of the common good.
The cartoon is coming from Mike Adams and http://www.naturalnews.com/

I wrote this to warn you and make you think about all of this, in the hope you get an open mind! You are brainwashed true all the media about conventional medical Health! Please have an open mind and you can have a long healthy life! If you want to know about an example of suppressing an alternative natural way to cure cancer than look for what happened with GNM (German New Medicine) that is practiced in Germany before dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer was taken out of practice.
Dr.  Hamer in interview with Prof. J. Miklosko

For me this was the first time. Now one year ago I saw a piece of the truth!
This website http://www.gnm-nl.be/ showed me an other side of the conventional medical health system. After this my research started to find out more about the truth.

This knowing of the truth did set me free of the quilt I always felt after the death of my son being poisoned during his fight against cancer and I did not know a natural cure to heal my son. After I know that suppression of the natural ways to cure cancer is the reason my son had to die and not because I did not have the time to look for the cure to help him. I could never have  found  the truth in the short time he lived after the diagnoses of cancer. And internet was not yet available to the people in 1994!
That is the main reason I want to share this information and to inform people that there are Natural Cures for Cancer and you need to have an open mind to find that out!

An other nice link to investigate!

The Five Best Anti-Viral Products to Beat Influenza, Swine Flu, Bird Flu and SARS